Thursday, September 23, 2021
Home Operations Survey: Most Settlement Fails Due to Middle Office Problems

Survey: Most Settlement Fails Due to Middle Office Problems

  • Survey by Torstone Technology in collaboration with GreySpark Partners reveals data and technology challenges in the middle-offices of banks and brokers
  • T+1 and CSDR pose operational challenges and costs for legacy middle-office systems

60% of institutions believe that settlement failures attributed to inadequacies of the middle-office are still a significant problem in their organization, according to a new global survey conducted by Torstone Technology, in collaboration with GreySpark Partners.

The institutions surveyed attributed settlement failures to incomplete matching of settlement instructions, issues meeting the settlement deadlines, the inability to borrow or recover, and operational or technology issues. As a result, 45% of respondents stated that they intend to change their middle-office system entirely.

The survey also reveals concerns around the potential joint impact of the proposed U.S. T+1 settlement cycle and incoming CSDR regulations on the middle office. Respondents indicated that while a shorter settlement cycle could reduce settlement risk, it will introduce operational challenges for banks and brokers, such as navigating shorter timelines to reconcile and repair trades. Further, according to the survey, CSDR will introduce punitive charges and buy-ins for trades that fail to settle and will drive up the cost of settlement failure – a risk that could increase under T+1.

Data flow disruption and the lack of straight-through processing (STP) in the middle-office were other significant issues highlighted by the survey:

  • Respondents highlighted widespread issues in facilitating the real-time transfer of static, trade and reference data from the back office to the front office and vice versa.
  • Respondents pointed to the problem of incorrect or missing data in the middle-office resulting from fragmented and siloed front, middle and back office functions that lack API-driven integration capabilities.
  • Respondents voiced difficulties in automating failed trade notifications to the front office due to fragmented systems’ reliance on manual processes.

According to Brian Collings, CEO for Torstone, fragmented legacy middle-office systems built with varying levels of functionality and automation are not only inefficient, time-consuming and costly but present significant operational challenges for banks and brokers of all sizes. “Automation in the middle-office via STP platforms is key to solving these problems – remedying data connectivity issues, ensuring the timely delivery of trade data and confirmations to clients, reducing settlement risk as well as preparing for the possibility of a T+1 settlement cycle,” Collings said.

“A lack of investment, over many years, has stifled efforts to rationalize and automate processes in the middle office in many banks and brokers,” said Rachel Lindstrom, Thought Leadership Manager at GreySpark. “However, as firms look to achieve STP to reduce settlement failures and speed up trade processing, transformation programs in many firms are shifting from the front office to address challenges in the middle office,” Lindstrom added.

The survey took responses from 58 individuals working in middle-office roles from leading buy and sell-side institutions in EMEA, APAC and North America on how firms are addressing middle-office issues. The full report can be accessed here.

- Advertisment -

Most Popular